AGLC4 Citation Generator

AGLC4
Finally Made Easy

Made for Australian law students. Build complex footnotes, create bibliographies with one click, and manage pinpoints, notes and citations, all with Pincite. Stop losing marks. Stop stressing. Stop wasting time. No AI. No compromises.

One finished citationcreates everything you need
Footnote

Patricia Wellman, ‘Statutory Interpretation and Federalism’ (2018) 44(2) Melbourne Law Review 517, 522.

Later footnote

Wellman (n 12) 522.

Bibliography

Wellman, Patricia, ‘Statutory Interpretation and Federalism’ (2018) 44(2) Melbourne Law Review 517

Reference Like a Professional

Pincite gives you the tools to create professional-grade footnotes for any citation. Not just the basics: reference over 160 source types, join sources with introductory signals, pinpoint to the judges speaking, translate foreign materials, and format quotations with every adjustment marked. If the AGLC4 has a rule for it, Pincite builds it.

From simple to complex · From commonplace to rare

LAWS2150 Final Essay.docx

III Context and Purpose

The better view is that context controls. In Harrigan v Bellamy, the High Court read the disputed power against the statute as a whole,1 a method the commentary has since pressed further,2 and one now mirrored in European data-protection law and the constitutional jurisprudence it answers to.3 Mason CJ put the point beyond argument:

An example essay
The foot of a law essay: every footnote below is what Pincite hands you.

[T]he grant of power takes its colour from the purpose of the statute … a court falls into error the moment it reads words in isolation from that purpose.4

A quotation with adjustments
Alteration bracketed, omission marked, and indented as a long quote, formatted in the Quotations tool.

1Harrigan v Bellamy (1991) 172 CLR 214, 229 (Mason CJ and Deane J) (‘Harrigan’).
A commonplace case
Reported series, with two judges named, including a short title.
2See especially Harrigan (n 1) 229. See also Patricia Wellman, ‘Statutory Interpretation and Federalism’ (2018) 44(2) Melbourne Law Review 517, 522.
A combined footnote
Two sources with two signals in one footnote.
3Loi no 78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés [Law No 78-17 of 6 January 1978 on Information Technology, Files and Liberties] (France) JO, 7 January 1978, 227, art 26. Cf Solange II, Bundesverfassungsgericht [German Constitutional Court], 2 BvR 197/83, 22 October 1986 reported in (1986) 73 BVerfGE 339, 376.
A rare, translated source
A French statute, title italicised and translation bracketed, contrasted with a German constitutional case, its popular name leading and its court translated.
4Harrigan (n 1) 231 (Mason CJ), quoting Wollondilly Shire Council v Fisher (1948) 48 SR (NSW) 34, 38 (Jordan CJ). See generally Convention on Diplomatic Correspondence and Exchange, opened for signature 14 March 1966, 621 UNTS 218 (entered into force 5 November 1969); Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v United States of America) (Merits) [1986] ICJ Rep 14, 98 [186]; Commonwealth, Parliamentary Debates, Senate, 13 May 2003, 10440 (Robert Hill, Minister for Defence).
14
One footnote, five sources
A later reference that quotes the case it draws on, then a treaty, an International Court of Justice decision and a parliamentary debate under one signal. Every piece engine-built, joined in the Citation Crafter.

Every example above was created in Pincite.

From blank page to bibliography.

Four steps, one workflow. Pick a step to see it in the product.

  • Choose from 161 citation forms across 50 source types, fill in the fields, and the footnote forms as you type, with ibid and the later reference beside it. Copy keeps the italics intact.

    Citations
    The Pincite generator's input fields for a reported case — case name, year, report series and starting page filled in, with the Optional, Pinpoint and Advanced sections beneath.